AGX-100 — Collaboration & Contributor Standards™

 

Canonical Version: 1.0
Status: Draft
Purpose: Define the standards, evaluation process, and expectations for external collaborators contributing to the AGiBa® ecosystem. Applications are reviewed through AGiBa®'s structured AI-assisted evaluation process.

 

 

Purpose

​

AGiBa® is developed as a specification-driven engineering platform. Every contributor is expected to work from approved governance documents rather than personal interpretation.

Contributors are selected based on their ability to understand, apply, and extend established specifications while maintaining consistency across the AGiBa® ecosystem.

 

 

Areas of Collaboration

 

We welcome interest from experienced professionals in:

​

• UX/UI Design

• Visual Design & Illustration

• Information Architecture

• Product Design

• Web Development

• Wix Studio Development

• Front-End Engineering

• AI & Prompt Engineering

• Data Visualization

• Systems Engineering

• Technical Writing

• Accessibility

• SEO & Performance

• Quality Assurance

 

 

Collaboration Philosophy

 

AGiBa® is not built through ad hoc design decisions.

 

Every page, illustration, interaction, component, and engineering decision is derived from the AGiBa® Governance Library™.

 

Contributors are expected to implement approved specifications rather than redefine them.

 

 

Evaluation Process

 

Every prospective collaborator follows the same structured review process.

 

​

Stage 1 — Submission

 

Applicants provide relevant materials such as:

​

• Portfolio

• Résumé

• Website

• GitHub repository (when applicable)

• Design samples

• Project examples

• References (optional)

 

​

Stage 2 — AI-Assisted Review

 

Submitted materials are reviewed through the AGiBa® AI evaluation process.

 

This review examines, where applicable:

​

• Technical capability

• Design quality

• Engineering discipline

• Specification-driven thinking

• Communication clarity

• Attention to detail

• Consistency

• Documentation practices

• Problem-solving approach

• Overall fit with AGiBa®

 

Applicants may be asked additional questions to better understand their experience, decision-making process, and approach to collaborative work.

​

​

Stage 3 — Founder Review

 

The Founder reviews the AI-assisted evaluation together with the applicant's materials.

 

Only applicants who demonstrate a strong alignment with AGiBa®'s standards proceed to final discussions.

 

 

Stage 4 — Project Assignment

 

Approved contributors receive clearly defined specifications and project objectives before implementation begins.

​

 

Working Standards

 

Contributors are expected to:

​

• Follow the AGiBa® Governance Library™.

• Follow the AGiBa® Design System™.

• Follow the AGiBa® Component Library™.

• Follow the AGiBa® Illustration Standards™.

• Follow the AGiBa® Engineering Standards™.

• Preserve visual consistency.

• Preserve terminology.

• Document significant implementation decisions.

• Ask questions when requirements are unclear instead of making assumptions.

 

 

Decision Authority

 

The AGiBa® Governance Library™ defines the standards.

 

AI-assisted reviews provide structured technical evaluations and recommendations.

 

The Founder & Product Owner retains final authority for contributor selection, approvals, governance changes, and project acceptance.

 

 

Public Statement for Collaborators

 

Prospective collaborators should expect a structured, specification-driven evaluation process.

 

Initial reviews are AI-assisted and focus on demonstrated skills, engineering discipline, and alignment with the AGiBa® Governance Library™. Qualified applicants may be invited to additional discussions before any collaboration begins.

 

AGiBa® values thoughtful engineering, clear documentation, and consistent execution over speed or improvisation.

​

​

​